In this classic work, Leo Strauss examines the problem of natural right and argues that there is a firm foundation in reality for the distinction between right and wrong in ethics and politics. On the centenary of Strauss's birth, and the fiftieth anniversary of the Walgreen Lectures which spawned the work, Natural Right and History remains as controversial and essential as eve...
In this classic work, Leo Strauss examines the problem of natural right and argues that there is a firm foundation in reality for the distinction between right and wrong in ethics and politics. On the centenary of Strauss's birth, and the fiftieth anniversary of the Walgreen Lectures which spawned the work, Natural Right and History remains as controversial and essential as ever. "Strauss ...makes a significant contribution towards an understanding of the intellectual crisis in which we find ourselves ...[and] brings to his task an admirable scholarship and a brilliant, incisive mind."--John H. Hallowell, American Political Science Review Leo Strauss (1899-1973) was the Robert Maynard Hutchins Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus in Political Science at the University of Chicago.
作者简介
· · · · · ·
Leo Strauss (1899--1973) was the Robert Maynard Hutchins Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus in Political Science at the University of Chicago.
目录
· · · · · ·
Introduction
I. Natural Right and the Historical Approach
II. Natural Right and the Distinction between Facts and Values
III. The Origin of the Idea of Natural Right
IV. Classic Natural Right
V. Modern Natural Right
· · · · · ·
(更多)
Introduction
I. Natural Right and the Historical Approach
II. Natural Right and the Distinction between Facts and Values
III. The Origin of the Idea of Natural Right
IV. Classic Natural Right
V. Modern Natural Right
A. Hobbes
B. Locke
VI. The Crisis of Modern Natural Right
A. Rousseau
B. Burke
Index
· · · · · · (收起)
这本书以natural right（称为“自然正当”似乎更加合适）的古-今流变为线索梳理了思想史。看起来，似乎是现代自然科学的兴起（teleology受到重创）导致了自Hobbes以降的新脉络：Locke发展了natural right的外延，而Rousseau则将state of nature推到极端；Burke的反动却不能再回到teleology，而是以the practical和histor...这本书以natural right（称为“自然正当”似乎更加合适）的古-今流变为线索梳理了思想史。看起来，似乎是现代自然科学的兴起（teleology受到重创）导致了自Hobbes以降的新脉络：Locke发展了natural right的外延，而Rousseau则将state of nature推到极端；Burke的反动却不能再回到teleology，而是以the practical和history取消了right本身。如果这一切都是现代自然科学摧毁目的论的结果，那么，纵然再厌恶虚无主义，natural right却也再不可能了。也许这就是现代人的命运。
ps. 坚持读下来了英文原文，对自己很是欣慰。(展开)
Leo Strauss, Natural Right and History, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1965 B. Locke At first glance Locke seems to reject altogether Hobbes's notion of natural law and to follow the traditional teaching. 【总论点：洛克对霍布斯的隐蔽继承】 Yet Lo...
(展开)
江绪林
生活·读书·新知三联书店2006版
圣卡奇亚诺
生活·读书·新知三联书店2003版
哲夫成城
生活·读书·新知三联书店2006版
洛桑学艺
生活·读书·新知三联书店2016版
我有一个小咪
0 有用 珈琲貓少女 2020-05-29 14:21:33
📍5/29/20
2 有用 马多马 2017-03-28 15:25:06
文笔不错
0 有用 傅满猪 2022-01-22 19:19:27
2013-2015 迷途指津
0 有用 烟 2013-02-20 19:07:00
每一章的分析都那么精妙绝伦。。
0 有用 大清国的猫托邦 2015-10-20 14:11:34
@2015-10-20 14:11:34
0 有用 丁萌 2023-10-08 16:01:11 日本
小时候读过好几遍，这次重读还是有船新的体验。驽钝如我。
0 有用 Vita Nova 2023-07-14 18:08:51 河北
染缸式的书。不管放进去什么素材产出来的东西都差不多。
0 有用 友人A 2023-01-16 22:52:17 北京
这本书以natural right（称为“自然正当”似乎更加合适）的古-今流变为线索梳理了思想史。看起来，似乎是现代自然科学的兴起（teleology受到重创）导致了自Hobbes以降的新脉络：Locke发展了natural right的外延，而Rousseau则将state of nature推到极端；Burke的反动却不能再回到teleology，而是以the practical和histor... 这本书以natural right（称为“自然正当”似乎更加合适）的古-今流变为线索梳理了思想史。看起来，似乎是现代自然科学的兴起（teleology受到重创）导致了自Hobbes以降的新脉络：Locke发展了natural right的外延，而Rousseau则将state of nature推到极端；Burke的反动却不能再回到teleology，而是以the practical和history取消了right本身。如果这一切都是现代自然科学摧毁目的论的结果，那么，纵然再厌恶虚无主义，natural right却也再不可能了。也许这就是现代人的命运。 ps. 坚持读下来了英文原文，对自己很是欣慰。 (展开)
0 有用 傅满猪 2022-01-22 19:19:27
2013-2015 迷途指津
0 有用 珈琲貓少女 2020-05-29 14:21:33
📍5/29/20