This is the revised version of Peter Laslett's acclaimed edition of Two Treatises of Government, which is widely recognised as one of the classic pieces of recent scholarship in the history of ideas, read and used by students of political theory throughout the world. This 1988 edition revises Dr Laslett's second edition (1970) and includes an updated bibliography, a guide to fu...
This is the revised version of Peter Laslett's acclaimed edition of Two Treatises of Government, which is widely recognised as one of the classic pieces of recent scholarship in the history of ideas, read and used by students of political theory throughout the world. This 1988 edition revises Dr Laslett's second edition (1970) and includes an updated bibliography, a guide to further reading and a fully reset and revised introduction which surveys advances in Locke scholarship since publication of the second edition. In the introduction, Dr Laslett shows that the Two Treatises were not a rationalisation of the events of 1688 but rather a call for a revolution yet to come.
目录
· · · · · ·
- Foreword
INTRODUCTION
1. The Book
2. Locke the man and Locke the writer
3. Two Treatises of Government and the Revolution of 1688
4. Locke and Hobbes
· · · · · ·
(更多)
- Foreword
INTRODUCTION
1. The Book
2. Locke the man and Locke the writer
3. Two Treatises of Government and the Revolution of 1688
4. Locke and Hobbes
5. The Social and political theory of Two Treatises of Government
Addendum: the dating of the composition of Two Treatises
Editorial Note
THE TEXT
- Preface
- First Treatise
- Second Treatise
- Bibliography
- Index
· · · · · · (收起)
Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought(共82册)，
这套丛书还有
《Pre-Revolutionary Writings》《Plato》《'The Commonwealth of Oceana' and 'A System of Politics'》《Later Political Writings》《Marsiglio of Padua》
等
。
苏案
商务印书馆1982版
江绪林
商务印书馆1982版
Vincent
北京出版社2007版
枝子
中国社会科学出版社2009版
眠雨堂
商务印书馆1982版
0 有用 周沐君 2010-12-28 04:56:36
经典自由主义政府观。
0 有用 GEB-耶-EGB 2016-11-29 13:14:32
Laslett
0 有用 任之GPT奶奶 2023-04-22 10:17:53 澳大利亚
洛克对语言的态度与霍布斯很不同。霍布斯对词语非常敏感，经常通过分析词源和词义来阐发自己的观点（比如对系辞是的分析，以所有格名词mine、thine、his解释产权）。洛克则不用这种细致的分析，而是非常善用生动的比喻来增加他的雄辩，造成一种不同于父权叙事的新叙事与新修辞。他还在目录前Preface的末尾预警他的论敌：欢迎出于追求真理的目的质疑我的假设、指出我的错误；但要揪住我的一点表述问题，或是抓住... 洛克对语言的态度与霍布斯很不同。霍布斯对词语非常敏感，经常通过分析词源和词义来阐发自己的观点（比如对系辞是的分析，以所有格名词mine、thine、his解释产权）。洛克则不用这种细致的分析，而是非常善用生动的比喻来增加他的雄辩，造成一种不同于父权叙事的新叙事与新修辞。他还在目录前Preface的末尾预警他的论敌：欢迎出于追求真理的目的质疑我的假设、指出我的错误；但要揪住我的一点表述问题，或是抓住我论证的细枝末节不放，则不能视作是对我著作的认真回应。 (展开)
0 有用 小波丢 2020-08-12 13:01:46
“The Second Treatise of Government” pp.268-291
0 有用 aisan4you 2011-08-09 17:22:04
全书的系统性展示了洛克哲学上的聪明，细节则显示了他的睿智和实践智慧。不仅仅是哲学家应该看的书，每一个对政治感兴趣的人都应该去细读；不仅仅应该去学习它的教条，它的精神更值得领会：除了民主、自由而外，更重要的是处理事务时的那种周全和谨慎。