Kojin Karatani was born in Amagasaki city between Osaka and Kobe in 1941.
He received his B.A. in economics and M.A. in English literature, both from Tokyo University.
Awarded the Gunzo Literary Prize at the age of 27 for an essay on Natsume Soseki, he began working actively as a literary critic, while teaching at Hosei University in Tokyo.
In 1975 he was invited to Yale University to teach Japanese literature as a visiting professor, where he became acquainted with Yale critics such as Paul de Man and Fredric Jameson.
In the 1980s, he devoted himself to abstract problems concerning "language, number, money", while at the same time committing himself to the political situation by editing the quarterly journal 'Critical Space' with Akira Asada. 'Critical Space' was the most influential intellectual media in Japan until it folded in 2002.
From 1990 onward, Karatani has taught regularly at Columbia University. He was also a regular member of ANY, the international architects' conference which was held annually for the last decade of the 20th century.
In 2006, Karatani has retired from teaching in Japan.
Major books:
(English)
Origins of Modern Japanese Literature, Duke University Press,1993
Architecture as Metaphor; Language, Number, Money, MIT Press,1995
Transcritique: On Kant and Marx, MIT Press, 2003
(Japanese)
Man in Awe, Tojusha, 1972
Meaning as Illness, Kawadeshobo, 1975
Marx: The Center of Possibilities, Kodansha, 1978
Origins of Modern Japanese literature, Kodansha, 1980
Architecture as Metaphor, Kodansha, 1983
Introspection and Retrospection, Kodansha,1984
Postmodernism and Criticism, Fukutake, 1985
Philosophical Inquiry 1, Kodansha, 1986
Language and Tragedy, Daisanbunmeisha, 1989
Philosophical Inquiry 2, Kodansha,1989
On the 'End', Fukutake, 1990
Collected Essays on Soseki, Daisanbumeisha, 1992
Materialism as Humor, Chikumashobo, 1993
Thoughts before the war, Bungeishunjusha, 1994
Sakaguchi Ango and Nakagami Kenji, Ohta Press, 1996
Ethics 21, Heibonsha, 2000
Transcritique: On Kant and Marx, Hihyokukansha, 2001
4 有用 似乎又 2017-03-01 12:51:00
马克思经典作为能阅读、挖掘出(尚未被思考)的“新的可能性”的中心;“《资本论》的卓越之处,并不因它暴露了资本主义生产的秘密,而是在于马克思对这种极为不稀奇、极为平凡的商品之‘极其奇怪’性质所感到的惊讶”(p.7)。马克思批判古典经济学;早期、晚期马克思;transcritic-跨越性批判
4 有用 יוֹחָנָן 2017-12-25 10:00:31
柄谷行人的起家应该就是这本书和《日本现代文学的起源》,一脉是马克思,一脉是解构主义。不过柄谷的马克思仍然具有相当程度的解构色彩,他使得文本和现实之间的区隔被打开,试图回答为什么抽象能够在个体之中被建立,尤其是价值是如何被建立起来的。根本上是因为他性的存在,也凭借着征服他性而存在,资本的秘密本身就在这里,不能在流通中产生又必须在流通中产生。
4 有用 养鸡场客卿 2020-04-22 18:06:24
一方面柄谷的灵感像喷泉一样,形成了断片;另一方面柄谷的思想方法却若隐若现。相对于其他著作,这本里面的柄谷更符合标签化印象中的“解构思想家”;但是柄谷常常谈到的“禁止”,是否又是拉康一脉的隐秘线索?我寻思这并非没有可能。 btw,译者本身应该和柄谷比较熟(?)加了很多诠释性的译者注,大多数算是比较中肯,妥当。
0 有用 ΑΥΣΝΙΧΤΣ 2016-06-07 21:32:41
这个翻译。。
1 有用 黄朿 2015-08-14 18:12:15
译者后记堪称同类文章的范本