作者:
Robert D. Putnam 出版社: Touchstone Books by Simon & Schuster 副标题: The Collapse and Revival of American Community 出版年: 2001-8-7 页数: 544 定价: USD 18.00 装帧: Paperback ISBN: 9780743203043
Few people outside certain scholarly circles had heard the name Robert D. Putnam before 1995. But then this self-described "obscure academic" hit a nerve with a journal article called "Bowling Alone." Suddenly he found himself invited to Camp David, his picture in People magazine, and his thesis at the center of a raging debate. In a nutshell, he argued that c...
Few people outside certain scholarly circles had heard the name Robert D. Putnam before 1995. But then this self-described "obscure academic" hit a nerve with a journal article called "Bowling Alone." Suddenly he found himself invited to Camp David, his picture in People magazine, and his thesis at the center of a raging debate. In a nutshell, he argued that civil society was breaking down as Americans became more disconnected from their families, neighbors, communities, and the republic itself. The organizations that gave life to democracy were fraying. Bowling became his driving metaphor. Years ago, he wrote, thousands of people belonged to bowling leagues. Today, however, they're more likely to bowl alone:
Television, two-career families, suburban sprawl, generational changes in values--these and other changes in American society have meant that fewer and fewer of us find that the League of Women Voters, or the United Way, or the Shriners, or the monthly bridge club, or even a Sunday picnic with friends fits the way we have come to live. Our growing social-capital deficit threatens educational performance, safe neighborhoods, equitable tax collection, democratic responsiveness, everyday honesty, and even our health and happiness.
The conclusions reached in the book Bowling Alone rest on a mountain of data gathered by Putnam and a team of researchers since his original essay appeared. Its breadth of information is astounding--yes, he really has statistics showing people are less likely to take Sunday picnics nowadays. Dozens of charts and graphs track everything from trends in PTA participation to the number of times Americans say they give "the finger" to other drivers each year. If nothing else, Bowling Alone is a fascinating collection of factoids. Yet it does seem to provide an explanation for why "we tell pollsters that we wish we lived in a more civil, more trustworthy, more collectively caring community." What's more, writes Putnam, "Americans are right that the bonds of our communities have withered, and we are right to fear that this transformation has very real costs." Putnam takes a stab at suggesting how things might change, but the book's real strength is in its diagnosis rather than its proposed solutions. Bowling Alone won't make Putnam any less controversial, but it may come to be known as a path-breaking work of scholarship, one whose influence has a long reach into the 21st century. --John J. Miller --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
From Publishers Weekly
"If you don't go to somebody's funeral, they won't come to yours," Yogi Berra once said, neatly articulating the value of social networks. In this alarming and important study, Putnam, a professor of sociology at Harvard, charts the grievous deterioration over the past two generations of the organized ways in which people relate to one another and partake in civil life in the U.S. For example, in 1960, 62.8% of Americans of voting age participated in the presidential election, whereas by 1996, the percentage had slipped to 48.9%. While most Americans still claim a serious "religious commitment," church attendance is down roughly 25%-50% from the 1950s, and the number of Americans who attended public meetings of any kind dropped 40% between 1973 and 1994. Even the once stable norm of community life has shifted: one in five Americans moves once a year, while two in five expect to move in five years. Putnam claims that this has created a U.S. population that is increasingly isolated and less empathetic toward its fellow citizens, that is often angrier and less willing to unite in communities or as a nation. Marshaling a plentiful array of facts, figures, charts and survey results, Putnam delivers his message with verve and clarity. He concludes his analysis with a concise set of potential solutions, such as educational programs, work-based initiatives and funded community-service programs, offering a ray of hope in what he perceives to be a dire situation. Agent, Rafe Sagalyn. 3-city tour; 20-city radio satellite tour. (June)
Copyright 2000 Reed Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
Robert D. Putnam is the Malkin Research Professor of Public Policy at Harvard University and a former Dean of the John F. Kennedy School of Government. Nationally honored as a leading humanist and a renowned scientist, he has written fourteen books, including the bestselling Our Kids and Bowling Alone, and has consulted for the last four US Presidents. In 2012, President Obama ...
Robert D. Putnam is the Malkin Research Professor of Public Policy at Harvard University and a former Dean of the John F. Kennedy School of Government. Nationally honored as a leading humanist and a renowned scientist, he has written fourteen books, including the bestselling Our Kids and Bowling Alone, and has consulted for the last four US Presidents. In 2012, President Obama awarded him the National Humanities Medal, the nation’s highest honor for contributions to the humanities. His research program, the Saguaro Seminar, is dedicated to fostering civic engagement in America. Visit RobertDPutnam.com.
在所有这些不同形式的社会资本里,可能最重要的区别便是连接性社会资本(bridging social capital)与黏合性社会资本(bonding social capital),也可称为兼容性(inclusive)社会资本和排他性(exclusive)社会资本。有些社会资本的形式是以关注自身为重点,倾向于强调小团体的地位。这类社会资本包括按种族区分的兄弟会,以教会为基础的妇女读书会,和时髦的乡村俱乐部。另外一些社会资本,其眼光向外看,包容各个社会阶层的成员,民权运动、青年服务组织等等.
黏合性社会资本有助于加强特定的互惠原则和成员间的团结。例如,以种族为特征区分的社会网络可以为成员提供社会和心理方面的支持。连接性社会网络,能够更好地连接外部资产。经济社会学家马克·格兰维特(Mark Granovetter)指出,在找工作的时候,或寻找政治同盟的时候,同其他较为陌生的人接触要比同自己关系亲密的亲友接触更为有效,因为亲友和自己的社会关系雷同,而其他陌生人的圈子则丰富的多。正如布里格斯(Xavier de Souza Briggs)说的那样,黏合性社会关系有助于保持现状,连接性社会关系有助于获得更多。( (查看原文)
The definition of social capital There is not a unified definition of social capital. The term was first used by Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk in 1895. Böhm-Bawerk is a member of Austrian School of economics. He used the term as the opposite of “private capi...
(展开)
0 有用 松鼠君 2013-05-18 23:16:47
为写research paper重读,没有当时读中文版时的激动,但对community问题有了新的、更深层次的想法。以及必须感谢一年多前这本书把我从思维困境中拉出,感谢它同《美国的民主》一起,让我重新梳理了对美国社会认知的途径。
0 有用 我去过一千次了 2022-01-03 15:25:15
20世纪,美国人参与政治、社区活动、集体运动、宗教活动等各种集体活动的积极性,都经历了稳定增长,然后从1970年开始迅速下跌的过程。作者结合各种调查数据,给出了几个猜测,作者认为最重要的两个是1)电视渗透到千家万户,人们闲余时间光看电视了, 2)一战二战成长起来的那批人 非常团结有社会责任感,现在他们老了逐渐退出历史舞台。两个稍微次要的原因:3)女性的角色从家庭工作到了社会工作,能参与社会活动的精... 20世纪,美国人参与政治、社区活动、集体运动、宗教活动等各种集体活动的积极性,都经历了稳定增长,然后从1970年开始迅速下跌的过程。作者结合各种调查数据,给出了几个猜测,作者认为最重要的两个是1)电视渗透到千家万户,人们闲余时间光看电视了, 2)一战二战成长起来的那批人 非常团结有社会责任感,现在他们老了逐渐退出历史舞台。两个稍微次要的原因:3)女性的角色从家庭工作到了社会工作,能参与社会活动的精力和时间少了;4)郊区化的城市结构【除了作者探讨的是一个非常有趣的社会/政治话题,作者对美国整个20世界大线条的勾画也是很有帮助的。社会学研究虽然没有那么清晰的因果,大多是看图说话,但是我觉得这种对big picture的掌握也是一种能力。结构非常清晰,没有时间一行行读的话,跳读也很轻松。 (展开)
0 有用 naruselover 2014-03-30 09:31:41
Just brilliant.
0 有用 Joonas Katsura 2022-04-12 00:17:46
在学校另外一个图书馆,因为懒得去市中心(步行十分钟😑),选取了 request服务。在study center拿到书后,发现沉甸甸的一本。粗略扫过,梳理了重要的几个概念,social trust, reciprocity, honesty等
0 有用 蒂洛 2011-05-10 22:22:32
这是神棍的理论。。。