Chalmers was elected a fellow of the Academy of Humanities in 1997. His primary research interest is the philosophy of science and he is author of the best-selling textbook What Is This Thing Called Science? which has been translated into many languages.
He has been a visiting scholar at the Flinders University Philosophy Department since 1999. For the 2007 fall semester he was...
Chalmers was elected a fellow of the Academy of Humanities in 1997. His primary research interest is the philosophy of science and he is author of the best-selling textbook What Is This Thing Called Science? which has been translated into many languages.
He has been a visiting scholar at the Flinders University Philosophy Department since 1999. For the 2007 fall semester he was a visiting professor at the University of Pittsburgh.
Chalmers is an associate professor at the History and Philosophy of Science department of the University of Sydney.
Books:
Science and Its Fabrication, Open University Press and University of Minnesota Press, 1990, pp. 142+xii. (Translated into French, German, Dutch, Spanish, Korean, Portuguese and Chinese.)
What Is This Thing Called Science?, 3rd revised edition, University of Queensland Press, Hackett, 1999. (Originally published 1976; second edition: 1982.)
The Scientist's Atom and the Philosopher's Stone – How Science Succeeded and Philosophy Failed to Gain Knowledge of Atoms, Springer, 2009, pp. 288+xii.
“Science”，或者说“科学”，在更多时候成为一种让人用来佐证自己观点的武器，而至于科学的研究是否为真，倒成了不太让人在意的事情。一页中的两句话非常讽刺好笑，第一句是“Many Marxists are keen to insist that historical materialism is a science”，第二句是“ It is the facts that are presumed...“Science”，或者说“科学”，在更多时候成为一种让人用来佐证自己观点的武器，而至于科学的研究是否为真，倒成了不太让人在意的事情。一页中的两句话非常讽刺好笑，第一句是“Many Marxists are keen to insist that historical materialism is a science”，第二句是“ It is the facts that are presumed to determine the superiority of Einstein's innovations over previous views on relativity, and anyone who fails to appreciate this is simply wrong”。(展开)
洛竹
商务印书馆2018版
丰无涯
河北科学技术出版社2002版
月下白桦
河北科学技术出版社2002版
松而不垮
商务印书馆2007版
鹦鹉螺
商务印书馆2007版
啄木鸟
河北科学技术出版社2002版
马一
商务印书馆2018版
0 有用 Angela 2013-09-15 12:53:27
方法论入门级，简单易懂。
0 有用 jjj 2019-01-07 17:54:37
科学哲学的经典导读书，行文精彩，容易理解。
0 有用 Fay 2013-01-26 20:34:46
摆在手边太久没看，因为背景知识太熟无新意，这两天还是过了一遍，确保无生词。
0 有用 Jessie 2023-12-05 15:52:55 广东
科学哲学的科普书，Chalmers把别人的观点嚼碎了，汇总到一起，用更易懂的语句喂给你，入门看看当个乐子可以。建议批判性去读，因为Chalmers也有曲解了原本别人的观点，比如anti-realism和realism这一章，他paraphrase时就忽略了原作者对rationality的强调。距离我看完过了太久，记不太清了。这本书有中译版，但不建议只读中译版，最好看英文为主，中译版仅仅起辅助作用。... 科学哲学的科普书，Chalmers把别人的观点嚼碎了，汇总到一起，用更易懂的语句喂给你，入门看看当个乐子可以。建议批判性去读，因为Chalmers也有曲解了原本别人的观点，比如anti-realism和realism这一章，他paraphrase时就忽略了原作者对rationality的强调。距离我看完过了太久，记不太清了。这本书有中译版，但不建议只读中译版，最好看英文为主，中译版仅仅起辅助作用。因为我记得在读的时候，很多翻译并不恰当，或者说没有把Chalmers想表达的意思翻译出来。 (展开)
1 有用 Rowan-ind 2024-12-02 20:13:45 德国
“Science”，或者说“科学”，在更多时候成为一种让人用来佐证自己观点的武器，而至于科学的研究是否为真，倒成了不太让人在意的事情。一页中的两句话非常讽刺好笑，第一句是“Many Marxists are keen to insist that historical materialism is a science”，第二句是“ It is the facts that are presumed... “Science”，或者说“科学”，在更多时候成为一种让人用来佐证自己观点的武器，而至于科学的研究是否为真，倒成了不太让人在意的事情。一页中的两句话非常讽刺好笑，第一句是“Many Marxists are keen to insist that historical materialism is a science”，第二句是“ It is the facts that are presumed to determine the superiority of Einstein's innovations over previous views on relativity, and anyone who fails to appreciate this is simply wrong”。 (展开)