Every economics textbook says the same thing: Money was invented to replace onerous and complicated barter systems—to relieve ancient people from having to haul their goods to market. The problem with this version of history? There’s not a shred of evidence to support it.
Here anthropologist David Graeber presents a stunning reversal of co...
Every economics textbook says the same thing: Money was invented to replace onerous and complicated barter systems—to relieve ancient people from having to haul their goods to market. The problem with this version of history? There’s not a shred of evidence to support it.
Here anthropologist David Graeber presents a stunning reversal of conventional wisdom. He shows that for more than 5,000 years, since the beginnings of the first agrarian empires, humans have used elaborate credit systems to buy and sell goods—that is, long before the invention of coins or cash. It is in this era, Graeber argues, that we also first encounter a society divided into debtors and creditors.
Graeber shows that arguments about debt and debt forgiveness have been at the center of political debates from Italy to China, as well as sparking innumerable insurrections. He also brilliantly demonstrates that the language of the ancient works of law and religion (words like “guilt,” “sin,” and “redemption”) derive in large part from ancient debates about debt, and shape even our most basic ideas of right and wrong. We are still fighting these battles today without knowing it.
Debt: The First 5,000 Years is a fascinating chronicle of this little known history—as well as how it has defined human history, and what it means for the credit crisis of the present day and the future of our economy.
0 有用 大脚 2016-06-27 15:24:30
没有从头到尾读完,但还是为作者独特的观察视角折服。理论有多严谨不好说,但揭示了所有的理论都不是颠扑不破的
0 有用 蕉下鹿 2022-01-18 16:43:41
已内化hhh
0 有用 Kevin Lee 2021-12-18 18:26:48
大卫·格雷伯在《债:第一个5000年》一书中指出,一些人的收入相对于消费需求或消费意愿存在短期或永久性不足,以高息向他们提供贷款往往是让他们沦为赤贫的罪魁祸首。——《债务和魔鬼》为什么经济学家要一再重复货币起源的错误?因为以物易物的货币起源说是经济学的基石之一,这样才没必要在经济学研究中考虑人的问题,他们不会将人与人之间的爱、恨等复杂的感情关系和社会关系带入到经济学研究中,可事实上这些东西才界定... 大卫·格雷伯在《债:第一个5000年》一书中指出,一些人的收入相对于消费需求或消费意愿存在短期或永久性不足,以高息向他们提供贷款往往是让他们沦为赤贫的罪魁祸首。——《债务和魔鬼》为什么经济学家要一再重复货币起源的错误?因为以物易物的货币起源说是经济学的基石之一,这样才没必要在经济学研究中考虑人的问题,他们不会将人与人之间的爱、恨等复杂的感情关系和社会关系带入到经济学研究中,可事实上这些东西才界定了我们人类的生活。 (展开)
10 有用 庄常飞 2012-10-19 10:14:59
这本书好的地方在于用人类学的角度思考经济、让我获益良多,不好的地方是作者野心太大、非要粗粗写5000年,造成许多不正确的概括,以及作者自己的思想偏见。与此同时,作为教授的作者学问可能是好的,但书真是写的散漫至极。
8 有用 ocean11 2015-08-25 21:13:45
用这书内容来理解希腊问题,比较刺激。不适合右派阅读,读得下去,也不好作右派了。关于货币的起源,真是颠覆经济学教科书的论述啊。照作者看法,经济学真像是宗教,而非学问了。最后一章前半截,决定中文版的出版。