作者:
Kenneth Pomeranz 出版社: University of California Press 副标题: State, Society, and Economy in Inland North China, 1853–1937 出版年: 1993-8-3 页数: 368 定价: USD 63.00 装帧: Hardcover ISBN: 9780520080515
This wholly original reassessment of critical issues in modern Chinese history traces social, economic, and ecological change in inland North China during the late Qing dynasty and the Republic. Using many new sources, Kenneth Pomeranz argues that the development of certain regions entailed the systematic underdevelopment of other regions. He maps changes in local finance, farm...
This wholly original reassessment of critical issues in modern Chinese history traces social, economic, and ecological change in inland North China during the late Qing dynasty and the Republic. Using many new sources, Kenneth Pomeranz argues that the development of certain regions entailed the systematic underdevelopment of other regions. He maps changes in local finance, farming, transportation, taxation, and popular protest, and analyzes the consequences for different classes, sub-regions, and genders.Pomeranz attributes these diverse developments to several causes: the growing but incomplete integration of North China into the world economy, the state's abandonment of many hinterland areas and traditional functions, and the effect of local social structures on these processes. He shows that hinterlands were made, not merely found, and were powerfully shaped by the strategies of local groups as well as outside forces. This wholly original reassessment of critical issues in modern Chinese history traces social, economic, and ecological change in inland North China during the late Qing dynasty and the Republic. Using many new sources, Kenneth Pomeranz argues that the development of certain regions entailed the systematic underdevelopment of other regions. He maps changes in local finance, farming, transportation, taxation, and popular protest, and analyzes the consequences for different classes, sub-regions, and genders.Pomeranz attributes these diverse developments to several causes: the growing but incomplete integration of North China into the world economy, the state's abandonment of many hinterland areas and traditional functions, and the effect of local social structures on these processes. He shows that hinterlands were made, not merely found, and were powerfully shaped by the strategies of local groups as well as outside forces.
本书还以其他研究中国的大多数著作所未用过的一种法，突出了社会和政治因素对经济选择的影响。关于对中国农民种植和劳动力分配的研究，可以分为人们所说的“单一逻辑”和“多重逻辑”论。“单一逻辑”论的支持者们（马若孟、托马斯・罗斯基、洛伦・·勃兰特）认为尽管不同的农民拥有不同的资源，但他们全都按同样的方法一作为古典经济学所说的深受局限的利润最大化者一来决定如何使用这些资源。“多重逻辑”论的支持者们（景甦和罗仑、陈翰笙、黄宗智）对其他许多观点不予赞同，但赞成不同的阶级按照根本不同的逻辑来决定其行为。例如，黄宗智认为，那些拥有大的经营性农场的人，是利润的最大化者，但那些更近似于糊口的农民们则不是。某些人对从其小农场中获取可靠的收入是如此的绝望，以至于他们从事着自我开发，在这类劳动获得的边际收人入已然极大地低于现行的报酬以后，仍把多余时间投入进来。其他人则孤注一掷地种植高风险、高利润的作物，以寻求从过于狭小的地块中竭力维持生计。其他多重逻辑的构想五花八门；把它们联合在一起的是这样的看法，认为一个家庭根据其在现有社会经济结构中的地位，而具有相应的经济理性。
1）“单一逻辑学派”例子，见 Ramon H。 Myers， Tbe Chinese Peasant Econonry； Thomas Wiens，Tbe Micro-economics of Peasant Economy； Thomas G。 Rawski， Economic Grontb in Prepar Cbina及 Loren Brandt， Commerialiration and grioulural Developmen。“多重逻辑”观的例子，见景甦、罗仑：《清代山东经营地主经济研究》，济南：齐鲁书店，1985年； Philip C。C。 Huang，The Peasant Economy and Social... (查看原文)
insightful research with a nicely fit vision of Modern Chinese transformation from the perspective of political economy. enjoyable reading, clear, and full of sparks
One thing shared by this book and The Great Divergence: regional variations (perspective of comparison) might be interrelated consequences of a same historical process (perspective of cross-regional n...One thing shared by this book and The Great Divergence: regional variations (perspective of comparison) might be interrelated consequences of a same historical process (perspective of cross-regional network).(展开)
响应Cohen china-centered转向的代表，对环境（ecological problem）和区域间不均衡发展（state有意为之）这两项因素的强调是主要contribution。此外还回应了duara的involuting state building。Great Divergence的一些presumption已经若隐若现了。 Truly deserved to represent ...响应Cohen china-centered转向的代表，对环境（ecological problem）和区域间不均衡发展（state有意为之）这两项因素的强调是主要contribution。此外还回应了duara的involuting state building。Great Divergence的一些presumption已经若隐若现了。 Truly deserved to represent China field in the AHA.(展开)
《腹地的构建——华北内地的国家、社会和经济（1853——1937）》（The Making of a Hinterland:State,Society,and in Inland North China,1853——1937）一书原是彭慕兰（Kenneth Pomeranz）完成于1988年的博士学位论文，经修改于1993年出版，该书于1994年获费正清东亚研究最佳...
(展开)
![[美国] 彭慕兰](https://img2.doubanio.com/img/author/medium/public/1516337044.51.jpg)
彭慕兰 作者
楚囚
社会科学文献出版社2005版
MHO
社会科学文献出版社2005版
卓青
社会科学文献出版社2005版
路上的我
上海人民出版社2017版
凉水凉
上海人民出版社2017版
奋斗的小绵羊
上海人民出版社2017版
933只蝶
上海人民出版社2017版
0 有用 skeeter 2009-10-14 10:16:17
insightful research with a nicely fit vision of Modern Chinese transformation from the perspective of political economy. enjoyable reading, clear, and full of sparks
0 有用 日格洞人 2016-05-03 03:06:49
One thing shared by this book and The Great Divergence: regional variations (perspective of comparison) might be interrelated consequences of a same historical process (perspective of cross-regional n... One thing shared by this book and The Great Divergence: regional variations (perspective of comparison) might be interrelated consequences of a same historical process (perspective of cross-regional network). (展开)
2 有用 功夫熊猫小碗熊 2016-03-18 12:39:17
彭氏盛名几乎全来自大分流，此书相对受冷落。其实此书可谓彭氏自己同北美前代研究“大分流”之始。史料数字整理运用和估算方法开发；对近代国家之历史功能分门别类，长时段历史趋势下降到具体地区渗透、与当地传统社会经济网络的缠绕，反过来又上升到历史趋势中成为下一波动力的来源；同时关注西方冲击中国回应、现代性在中国开展与马克思主义/依附理论/反帝国主义（恰是柯文所言北美三波中国研究）和施坚雅式分区地理模型四股知... 彭氏盛名几乎全来自大分流，此书相对受冷落。其实此书可谓彭氏自己同北美前代研究“大分流”之始。史料数字整理运用和估算方法开发；对近代国家之历史功能分门别类，长时段历史趋势下降到具体地区渗透、与当地传统社会经济网络的缠绕，反过来又上升到历史趋势中成为下一波动力的来源；同时关注西方冲击中国回应、现代性在中国开展与马克思主义/依附理论/反帝国主义（恰是柯文所言北美三波中国研究）和施坚雅式分区地理模型四股知识潮流，认为西方渗透确实存在但在黄运地区未能沿重要河流网络深入；现代性在此地区可表现为国家丢失传统公共福利提供者和秩序维护者逻辑而转向资源抽取、全盘利益视角和秩序层级顶点者、造成传统社会网络崩解重组等历史过程；帝国主义渗透造成不同层级市场接入国际市场程度不同，核心边缘层次因地理生态贸易网络等而变动。 (展开)
0 有用 Donald 2015-01-11 14:37:21
Quite impressive; not happy about the mercantilist explanation (way too static), but will leave that for a later discussion.
0 有用 王大福 2022-11-05 09:02:23 美国
济宁的士绅和商人真厉害…清末民初关系网发达的地方士绅争取铁路资源似乎和马啸老师书中职级高配的官员争取高铁资源的机制有相似之处…
0 有用 常务副momo 2024-02-21 14:05:36 美国
响应Cohen china-centered转向的代表，对环境（ecological problem）和区域间不均衡发展（state有意为之）这两项因素的强调是主要contribution。此外还回应了duara的involuting state building。Great Divergence的一些presumption已经若隐若现了。 Truly deserved to represent ... 响应Cohen china-centered转向的代表，对环境（ecological problem）和区域间不均衡发展（state有意为之）这两项因素的强调是主要contribution。此外还回应了duara的involuting state building。Great Divergence的一些presumption已经若隐若现了。 Truly deserved to represent China field in the AHA. (展开)
0 有用 王大福 2022-11-05 09:02:23 美国
济宁的士绅和商人真厉害…清末民初关系网发达的地方士绅争取铁路资源似乎和马啸老师书中职级高配的官员争取高铁资源的机制有相似之处…
0 有用 每天户外2小时 2018-08-18 20:12:55
一般般
0 有用 康健 2017-02-16 22:36:48
求 该书英文版235-238页的The Warlord Years，照片即可。谢谢。
1 有用 筱纹 2016-11-04 13:04:53
感觉这本其实比大分流有意思。。。