World literature was long defined in North America as an established canon of European masterpieces, but an emerging global perspective has challenged both this European focus and the very category of "the masterpiece." The first book to look broadly at the contemporary scope and purposes of world literature, What Is World Literature? probes the uses and abuses of world literat...
World literature was long defined in North America as an established canon of European masterpieces, but an emerging global perspective has challenged both this European focus and the very category of "the masterpiece." The first book to look broadly at the contemporary scope and purposes of world literature, What Is World Literature? probes the uses and abuses of world literature in a rapidly changing world.
In case studies ranging from the Sumerians to the Aztecs and from medieval mysticism to postmodern metafiction, David Damrosch looks at the ways works change as they move from national to global contexts. Presenting world literature not as a canon of texts but as a mode of circulation and of reading, Damrosch argues that world literature is work that gains in translation. When it is effectively presented, a work of world literature moves into an elliptical space created between the source and receiving cultures, shaped by both but circumscribed by neither alone. Established classics and new discoveries alike participate in this mode of circulation, but they can be seriously mishandled in the process. From the rediscovered Epic of Gilgamesh in the nineteenth century to Rigoberta Menchú's writing today, foreign works have often been distorted by the immediate needs of their own editors and translators.
Eloquently written, argued largely by example, and replete with insightful close readings, this book is both an essay in definition and a series of cautionary tales.
David Damrosch is Professor of English and Comparative Literature at Columbia University and President of the American Comparative Literature Association for 2002/03. His books include The Narrative Covenant, We Scholars, and Meetings of the Mind (Princeton). He is the editor of The Longman Anthology of World Literature.
‘A wild idea, unattainable in practice, worthy not of an actual reader but of a deluded keeper of archives who is also a multimillionaire.” “Scholars of world literature risk becoming little more than the literary ecotourists who dwell mentally in one or...
(展开)
0 有用 鱼伊尹 2016-01-18 16:07:48
Lord D的書 無腦點讚安利
4 有用 Manchild 2014-01-22 02:58:05
补充一句:以前看苏的选集里宇文所安和周蕾关于北岛诗翻译的辩论,后看前言里也把这事儿拿来说译介和阅读本土化。
0 有用 slow brewed🩴 2023-03-18 04:00:21 英国
Intro
5 有用 sleepinwine 2015-04-14 21:11:54
论点其实很简单,说实话有点啰嗦。。。
0 有用 エルロスヘ 2021-03-15 06:20:06
读第一章及结论。三点五星。其他章其实不太需要看,因为核心的东西已经讲完了。Damrosch厉害之处在于各类材料信手拈来,但他的世界文学体系理论较为简单,不如卡萨诺瓦和莫莱蒂