Name: Simians, Cyborgs, and Women
ISBN: 9780415903875

作者: Donna Haraway
出版社: Routledge
副标题: The Reinvention of Nature
出版年: 1990-12-14
页数: 312
定价: USD 46.95
装帧: Paperback
ISBN: 9780415903875

豆瓣评分

8.6

53人评价

5星

49.1%
4星

47.2%
3星

1.9%
2星

0.0%
1星

1.9%

评价:

内容简介 · · · · · ·

Donna Haraway analyses accounts, narratives, and stories of the creation of nature, living organisms, and cyborgs (cybernetic components); showing how deeply cultural assumptions penetrate into allegedly value-neutral medical research.

作者简介 · · · · · ·

One of the founders of the posthumanities, Donna J. Haraway is professor in the History of Consciousness program at the University of California, Santa Cruz. Author of many books and widely read essays, including The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness and the now-classic essay "The Cyborg Manifesto," she received the J.D. Bernal Prize in 2000, ...

(展开全部)

目录 · · · · · ·

I. Nature as a System of Production and Reproduction
1. Animal Sociology and a Natural Economy of the Body Politic
2. The Past Is the Contested Zone
3. The Biological Enterprise
II. Contested Readings: Narrative Natures
4. In the Beginning Was the Word
· · · · · · (更多)

原文摘录 · · · · · · ( 全部 )

在这里，我们作为女权主义者，发现自己固执地与许多从业科学家的话语相结合，当一切被说出和做完时，他们大多相信他们在描述和发现的事情，通过他们所有建构和争论的方式。 (查看原文)

黛轩主人爱黛说 1赞 2013-07-01 03:03:57

—— 引自第260页
（harding将这些方法的目标称为一种“后继科学”。）后继科学的计划提供一种对世界更充分、更丰富和更完善的描述，女权主义者在其中享有资本，目的是在这个世界中过得好，并批判地、反射地关联我们自己和他人的统治行为，以及构成所有地位的特权和压迫的不平等部分。 (查看原文)

黛轩主人爱黛说 1赞 2013-07-01 03:03:57

—— 引自第260页

> 全部原文摘录

喜欢读"Simians, Cyborgs, and Women"的人也喜欢 · · · · · ·

: Primate Visions

: The Body Multiple

: Science in Action

: How We Became Posthuman

: Sociology and Empire

: Art Since 1900

: We Have Never Been Modern

: Aramis, or the Love of Technology

: Neoliberalism as Exception

: Cruel Optimism

我来说两句

短评 · · · · · · ( 全部 31 条 )

Simians, Cyborgs, and Women的话题 · · · · · · ( 全部条 )

什么是话题

无论是一部作品、一个人，还是一件事，都往往可以衍生出许多不同的话题。将这些话题细分出来，分别进行讨论，会有更多收获。

我要写书评

Simians, Cyborgs, and Women的书评 · · · · · · ( 全部 7 条 )

热门 / 最新 / 好友 /只看本版本的评论

改个昵称 2020-11-19 21:49:58 河南大学出版社2012版

赛博格宣言详解-终版-更新完毕：20210112

这篇书评可能有关键情节透露

（声明：1.严禁站外转载；2.只用作学术交流，禁止用来挑起性别对立。）先附篇译文应该（不完整但基本都有）。[严泽胜译] 1集成电路中的妇女的共同语言的反讽之梦一、何为赛博格？ 1、Cyborg：赛博（格）为音译，真正含义是半机械人，即人的身体部分器官被用机械替代。是一种... (展开)

101

9回应

Pieds Glacés 2011-02-09 22:37:21 群學2010版

科技视角的性别乌托邦 (深圳晶報﹕2010年12月19日)

科技视角的性别乌托邦 (深圳晶報﹕2010年12月19日) ● 彭砺青（图书馆职员，香港） (问题不是事实如何，而是怎样的论述造成怎样的事实。哈洛威认为，一直以来男性文化论述下的自然科学支配了自然，现在是谋求改变这种论述的时候。作者于是提出了关于赛伯格(cyborg)... (展开)

0回应

哲学菜鸟 2015-04-26 22:20:47 河南大学出版社2012版

无力吐槽的翻译

关于这本书的翻译实在不想说什么了。我就节选一点吧，赛博格是哈拉维的核心概念，这本书翻译的是“赛博格是一种控制生物体，一种机器和生物体的混合，一种社会现实的生物，也是一种科幻小说的人物。”[P205]而英文的原义是指赛博格既是生物也是机器，既是现实存在的也是虚拟科... (展开)

0回应

黛轩主人爱黛说 2013-07-01 02:54:42 河南大学出版社2012版

无法自圆其说的译者

原书很精彩，翻译实在是够呛，很多倒装句都原封不动的按英语句式直接翻译出来，摆在那里，于是就形成了，一个句子的意思前后脱节的情况。最糟糕的是，这样一来，作者的本意就给说反了。事实上，Haraway从认识论的上批判了当下女权主义的固步自封的以反对科学话语的话语来复... (展开)

1回应

科特迪瓦 2019-05-27 02:19:39 河南大学出版社2012版

赛博格：边界模糊的隐喻

1、生物性是社会性的基础，技术与社会的关系是一种不容忽视的社会关系；女权主义者对生物决定论和技术决定论的批判导致她们因噎废食，彻底关闭了从生物和科技角度理解性别压迫、开展女权批判的可能性。 2、“赛博格”是机器和有机体的结合，也是一种对边界模糊现象的隐喻（物种... (展开)

1回应

凌点三十分 2021-01-03 17:32:34 河南大学出版社2016版

赛博格的尝试：打破社会建构的性别边界

这篇书评可能有关键情节透露

哈拉维著作《类人猿、赛博格和女人》关注的对象是被主流社会所边缘化的主体，他们是西方中心论下进化、技术和生物叙事中不稳定的角色，也相应地体现了哈拉维的三大研究领域及其转向：从灵长类动物学家，转变为社会主义女权主义者、赛博格女权主义者。本文出自书中的第八章，主... (展开)

0回应

clee 2022-03-10 12:58:06

为什么人人都应该读读女性主义 - 赛博格宣言掩卷

妇女节的前一天，第二次读完Donna Haraway的A Cyborg Manifesto，感觉仿佛下口了一杯回甘似蜜的陈年普洱。普洱不是给年轻人饮的，当味蕾慢慢麻木，廉价的气泡都已厌倦，只有在钝感的苦之后的一丝丝如蜜糖般的芬芳，才能带来醍醐灌顶的满足。这样的感受得来不易。至少在一年多... (展开)

0回应

> 更多书评 7篇

读书笔记 · · · · · ·

我来写笔记

按有用程度
按页码先后
最新笔记

展开收起
9. Situated Knowleges p187

Mow

Feminists don't need a doctrine of objectivity that promises transcendence, a story that loses track of its mediations just where someone might be held responsible for something, and unlimited instrumental power. We don't want a theory of innocent powers to represent the world, where language and bodies both fall into the bliss of organic symbiosis. We also don't want to theorize the world, muc...
2022-03-07 19:32:23 1人喜欢

Feminists don't need a doctrine of objectivity that promises transcendence, a story that loses track of its mediations just where someone might be held responsible for something, and unlimited instrumental power. We don't want a theory of innocent powers to represent the world, where language and bodies both fall into the bliss of organic symbiosis. We also don't want to theorize the world, much less act within it, in terms of Global Systems, but we do need an earth-wide network of connections, including the ability partially to translate knowledges among very different - and power-differentiated - communities. We need the power of modern critical theories of how meanings and bodies get made, not in order to deny meaning and bodies, but in order to live in meanings and bodies that have a chance for a future.
引自 9. Situated Knowledges

推荐

回应 2022-03-07 19:32:23
展开收起
Chapter Seven 'Gender' for a Marxist Dictionary: The Sexual Politics of a Word

wolfsring (未来的岁月会化为乌有)

the disappearance of the 'women' class What makes a woman is a specific relation of appropriation by a man. Like race, sex is an 'imaginary' formation of the kind that produces reality, including bodies then perceived as prior to all construction. 'Woman' only exists as this kind of imaginary being, while women are the product of a social relation of appropriation, naturalized as sex. A feminis...
2020-07-27 00:31:25

the disappearance of the 'women' class
What makes a woman is a specific relation of appropriation by a man. Like race, sex is an 'imaginary' formation of the kind that produces reality, including bodies then perceived as prior to all construction. 'Woman' only exists as this kind of imaginary being, while women are the product of a social relation of appropriation, naturalized as sex. A feminist is one who fights for women as a class and for the disappearance of that class. The key struggle is for the destruction of the social system of heterosexuality, because 'sex' is the naturalized political category that founds society as heterosexual. All the social sciences based on the category of 'sex' (most of them) must be overthrown.
引自第138页

推荐

回应 2020-07-27 00:31:25

展开收起
9. Situated Knowleges p187

Mow

Feminists don't need a doctrine of objectivity that promises transcendence, a story that loses track of its mediations just where someone might be held responsible for something, and unlimited instrumental power. We don't want a theory of innocent powers to represent the world, where language and bodies both fall into the bliss of organic symbiosis. We also don't want to theorize the world, muc...
2022-03-07 19:32:23 1人喜欢

Feminists don't need a doctrine of objectivity that promises transcendence, a story that loses track of its mediations just where someone might be held responsible for something, and unlimited instrumental power. We don't want a theory of innocent powers to represent the world, where language and bodies both fall into the bliss of organic symbiosis. We also don't want to theorize the world, much less act within it, in terms of Global Systems, but we do need an earth-wide network of connections, including the ability partially to translate knowledges among very different - and power-differentiated - communities. We need the power of modern critical theories of how meanings and bodies get made, not in order to deny meaning and bodies, but in order to live in meanings and bodies that have a chance for a future.
引自 9. Situated Knowledges

推荐

回应 2022-03-07 19:32:23
展开收起
Chapter Seven 'Gender' for a Marxist Dictionary: The Sexual Politics of a Word

wolfsring (未来的岁月会化为乌有)

the disappearance of the 'women' class What makes a woman is a specific relation of appropriation by a man. Like race, sex is an 'imaginary' formation of the kind that produces reality, including bodies then perceived as prior to all construction. 'Woman' only exists as this kind of imaginary being, while women are the product of a social relation of appropriation, naturalized as sex. A feminis...
2020-07-27 00:31:25

the disappearance of the 'women' class
What makes a woman is a specific relation of appropriation by a man. Like race, sex is an 'imaginary' formation of the kind that produces reality, including bodies then perceived as prior to all construction. 'Woman' only exists as this kind of imaginary being, while women are the product of a social relation of appropriation, naturalized as sex. A feminist is one who fights for women as a class and for the disappearance of that class. The key struggle is for the destruction of the social system of heterosexuality, because 'sex' is the naturalized political category that founds society as heterosexual. All the social sciences based on the category of 'sex' (most of them) must be overthrown.
引自第138页

推荐

回应 2020-07-27 00:31:25

展开收起
9. Situated Knowleges p187

Mow

Feminists don't need a doctrine of objectivity that promises transcendence, a story that loses track of its mediations just where someone might be held responsible for something, and unlimited instrumental power. We don't want a theory of innocent powers to represent the world, where language and bodies both fall into the bliss of organic symbiosis. We also don't want to theorize the world, muc...
2022-03-07 19:32:23 1人喜欢

Feminists don't need a doctrine of objectivity that promises transcendence, a story that loses track of its mediations just where someone might be held responsible for something, and unlimited instrumental power. We don't want a theory of innocent powers to represent the world, where language and bodies both fall into the bliss of organic symbiosis. We also don't want to theorize the world, much less act within it, in terms of Global Systems, but we do need an earth-wide network of connections, including the ability partially to translate knowledges among very different - and power-differentiated - communities. We need the power of modern critical theories of how meanings and bodies get made, not in order to deny meaning and bodies, but in order to live in meanings and bodies that have a chance for a future.
引自 9. Situated Knowledges

推荐

回应 2022-03-07 19:32:23
展开收起
Chapter Seven 'Gender' for a Marxist Dictionary: The Sexual Politics of a Word

wolfsring (未来的岁月会化为乌有)

the disappearance of the 'women' class What makes a woman is a specific relation of appropriation by a man. Like race, sex is an 'imaginary' formation of the kind that produces reality, including bodies then perceived as prior to all construction. 'Woman' only exists as this kind of imaginary being, while women are the product of a social relation of appropriation, naturalized as sex. A feminis...
2020-07-27 00:31:25

the disappearance of the 'women' class
What makes a woman is a specific relation of appropriation by a man. Like race, sex is an 'imaginary' formation of the kind that produces reality, including bodies then perceived as prior to all construction. 'Woman' only exists as this kind of imaginary being, while women are the product of a social relation of appropriation, naturalized as sex. A feminist is one who fights for women as a class and for the disappearance of that class. The key struggle is for the destruction of the social system of heterosexuality, because 'sex' is the naturalized political category that founds society as heterosexual. All the social sciences based on the category of 'sex' (most of them) must be overthrown.
引自第138页

推荐

回应 2020-07-27 00:31:25