作者:
Alasdair MacIntyre 出版社: University of Notre Dame Press 副标题: A Study in Moral Theory, Third Edition 出版年: 2007-3-1 页数: 312 定价: USD 26.00 装帧: Paperback ISBN: 9780268035044
In this classic work, Alasdair MacIntyre examines the historical and conceptual roots of the idea of virtue, diagnoses the reasons for its absence in personal and public life, and offers a tentative proposal for its recovery. While the individual chapters are wide-ranging, once pieced together they comprise a penetrating and focused argument about the price of modernity. In the...
In this classic work, Alasdair MacIntyre examines the historical and conceptual roots of the idea of virtue, diagnoses the reasons for its absence in personal and public life, and offers a tentative proposal for its recovery. While the individual chapters are wide-ranging, once pieced together they comprise a penetrating and focused argument about the price of modernity. In the Third Edition prologue, MacIntyre revisits the central theses of the book and concludes that although he has learned a great deal and has supplemented and refined his theses and arguments in other works, he has "as yet found no reason for abandoning the major contentions" of this book. He remains "committed to the thesis that it is only from the standpoint of a very different tradition, one whose beliefs and presuppositions were articulated in their classical form by Aristotle, that we can understand both the genesis and the predicament of moral modernity."
作者简介
· · · · · ·
Alasdair MacIntyre is research professor of philosophy at the University of Notre Dame. He is the author of numerous books, including Whose Justice? Which Rationality? (Notre Dame Press, 1988) and Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry: Encyclopaedia, Genealogy, and Tradition (Notre Dame Press, 1990).
in a society that is incompatible to moral questions, M. gives argumentation for such incompatibility. When humans lose their functions in a society, then the ethics attached to the bureaucratic syste...in a society that is incompatible to moral questions, M. gives argumentation for such incompatibility. When humans lose their functions in a society, then the ethics attached to the bureaucratic system vanish as well. Like Nietzschean morality, the only surviving ideology is a highly assertive and individual one.(展开)
豆友38324
译林出版社2011版
胡明亮
译林出版社2011版
小鱼爱哲学
译林出版社2024版
行影者
译林出版社2011版
林航
中国社会科学出版社1995版
0 有用 fleurrrr_ 2024-02-24 13:48:58 上海
in a society that is incompatible to moral questions, M. gives argumentation for such incompatibility. When humans lose their functions in a society, then the ethics attached to the bureaucratic syste... in a society that is incompatible to moral questions, M. gives argumentation for such incompatibility. When humans lose their functions in a society, then the ethics attached to the bureaucratic system vanish as well. Like Nietzschean morality, the only surviving ideology is a highly assertive and individual one. (展开)
0 有用 布衣不绕 2019-03-02 02:44:31
好看！！！
6 有用 雨飞 2019-06-09 19:15:23
从堕胎、战争、纳税等美国日常社会论题说起，透彻解释了现代性尤其是自由主义文化霸权下的各种思想和道德立场的不可化约。从这种社会思想深入到它的社会构成，批判了经理人、鉴赏家、治愈师式的人格特征和韦伯的官僚制主义。详细勾勒了古风希腊、雅典希腊、中世纪欧洲和现代欧洲的美德内涵和分歧，为美德定义了“实践”和“泰勒斯telos”两个本质，进而对比了当代和古典社会的背景异同、追溯了现代人如何在丢失共同体生活共性... 从堕胎、战争、纳税等美国日常社会论题说起，透彻解释了现代性尤其是自由主义文化霸权下的各种思想和道德立场的不可化约。从这种社会思想深入到它的社会构成，批判了经理人、鉴赏家、治愈师式的人格特征和韦伯的官僚制主义。详细勾勒了古风希腊、雅典希腊、中世纪欧洲和现代欧洲的美德内涵和分歧，为美德定义了“实践”和“泰勒斯telos”两个本质，进而对比了当代和古典社会的背景异同、追溯了现代人如何在丢失共同体生活共性的同时保留了碎片化和变异后的美德话语体系，揭示了这种话语及其道德论证在个人主义市场至上的自由主义时代其实只是“感情用事emotism”本质，批判了把道德判断根系于个体偏好和意气（passion）的混乱现状。顺便指出罗尔斯和诺齐克代表的两种不相容的正义理论都缺乏“应得desert”这一美德思维。 (展开)
0 有用 装睡的人 2017-02-02 12:42:35
麦金泰尔所能带来的显著贡献之一大概在于帮助人们辨析历史主义与相对主义之间的根本差异吧，毕竟有另一股力量一直在试图模糊这一差异。
0 有用 阿提斯 2012-09-27 15:49:29
Like