Perhaps others will have other feelings about this case.But the point is that somewhere(and if not in this case,where?) one reaches the necessity that such things as deep attachments to other persons will express themselves in the world in ways which cannot at the same time embody the impartial view,and that they also run the risk of offending against it.
They run that risk if they exist at all;yet unless such things exist,there will not be enough substance or conviction in a man's life to compel his allegiance to life itself.Life has to have substance if anything is to have sense,including adherence to the impartial system;but if it has substance,then it cannot grant supreme importance to the impartial system,and that system's hold on it will be,at the limit,insecure. (查看原文)
Moral Luck ——Bernard Williams 写在前面:这是我今年所读到过的最难的论文,威廉斯的写作风格和帕菲特形成了两个极端,前者汪洋恣肆、才华横溢,后者中正平和,谨慎有加。 一、两种道德传统 Williams的论文面对两种道德传统,第一种是一种古代幸福观,第二种是康德主义的道...
(展开)
18 有用 切 2012-01-20 21:18:50
算作是我的灯塔书。每次阅读都带着感恩的心,感恩身边有这么多弱智可以盘剥
1 有用 风挑一点灯 2014-05-06 21:35:05
只能说瞥过。看句法,威廉斯的英文应该是长句循环的那种,翻译很难
0 有用 Discrimen 2011-09-15 23:04:41
第二章
0 有用 憨韩喊汗 2022-10-03 13:40:40 北京
实话说,读不懂。敬重的四星,但对我而言其实是无效的灌输🥲
4 有用 小波福娃 2017-08-15 20:57:17
读了很久。很受启发,有待重新通读。